Showing posts with label English. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English. Show all posts

Friday, April 12, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 11 abril 2013


  • The campaign Igreja ! Paga Já ! now has many lovely logos. We also have 3 almost finished images. We will finalize them during the week, and get another 6 by next week.

  •  Our next meeting will be on Wednesday, April 17th, and will not take place in Mob. We will meet outdoors. We will decide about it later this week. After our meeting we plan to attend the meeting of Ateísmo e Humanismo which will be in Fabulas at 20:00.

  •  We are considering the option of making a debate on the legal and financial situation of the Catholic church in Portugal, with detailed facts etc. To this end, we will contact persons and organizations to find an expert opinion about the issue.

  • We will send a letter to the international NGOs and atheist bloggers to ask for support for and solidarity with the campaign. The text will be finalized in the next meeting.

Friday, April 5, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 4 abril 2013




  • We have many logo options for the campaign. We decided to use many logos, although keeping one as the main logo. We will finalize the logo this week and then finalize the blog.
  • We started working on visual material. We made a brainstorming on what kind of images we could use. We will start spreading them this week.
  • We now have a detailed campaign strategy, structuring our route for the following two months.

Next meeting, April 11th, at Mob. :)

Monday, March 25, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 21 março 2013




  • We will keep our Facebook page more active.
  • Our campaign has a name now. :) "Igreja ! Paga já !"
    • We finalized the campaign text and talked about several slogans and images.
    • We will now
      • create a blog for the campaign,
      • produce visual images using the slogans,
      • create a logo,
      • send a letter to international NGOs informing them about the campaign and requesting solidarity


Saturday, March 2, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 28 fevereiro 2013




  • On our new campaign, we did
    • Power Analysis, and
    • Communication Strategy.
  • We will give a break of three weeks. During that time, we decided to work on
    • a text for the campaign
    • a coherent internal campaign plan
    • slogans
    • ideas for visual and graphic material
    • campaign name.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

O Que Fazem os Professores (What Teachers Make) de Taylor Mali




 

On January 26th, 2013, the teachers in Portugal made a country-wide demonstration against the austerity measures directed towards public education.

Inspired by the amazing poem What Teachers Make by Taylor Mali, we decided to make a small performative activity during the demonstration in Lisbon.

We are thankful to Taylor Mali for his inspiring work, and to all the participants who enthusiastically volunteered to take part in the video.


Saturday, February 23, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 21 fevereiro 2013



  • Exchange Market (Mercado de Trocas):
    • We participated in the market with the motto "É uma questão de questionar."
    • As a first experience, our experience was good.
    • The next one will be on March 16th. As an improvement, we decided to make
      • an announcement on the event page so that people bring their pen-drives
      • a guideline describing how to get to videos (pointing the list etc)

  • Video project (O que fazem os professores):
    • We will finalize the video by Sunday and share it on social media.
    • We decided to have another version with English subtitles. 

  • Campaigning workshop
    • The workshop consists of 3 parts:
      • Campaign Objective
      • Power Analysis
      • Communication Strategy
    • We only worked on Campaign Objective.

  • New campaign
    •  In the workshop we considered the following problems
      • tax immunities of the Catholic church
      • atheists considered radicals and marginals in the society
      • religious practices inside public schools (such as Christmas celebrations)
      • religious discourse in public schools
      • the fact that the lottery institution (supposedly a religious charity organization) owns many houses which are abandoned
      • religious institutions control the lottery money
      • church own the most amount of houses in Portugal and does not pay IMI
      • there are too many religious schools
    • We decided to work on Tax Immunities
    • We tried to get a S.M.A.A.A.R.R.T objective for our campaign.
    • We decided on some organizational objectives and milestones.

Friday, February 15, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 14 fevereiro 2013




  • Exchange Market (Mercado de Trocas) : Our motto in the market will be "É uma questão de questionar.
    • As the theme of the market is consumption and the consumer society, we decided to share e-books and videos related to questioning the existing social norms. We will include the issue of religion within this context, even though we will share many books unrelated to religion.
  • Balance: We made a small evaluation, including
      • how we feel about the group,
      • if we consider ourselves successful, and
      • how much time and energy we can reserve for the group in the future.
    • According to this balance, we decided to have well-defined, measurable and timed objectives, both organizational and political ones. We therefore decided to preserve a big part of our next meeting to a workshop on building a campaign.
    • We will structure our activities, actions and roles around this campaign. Therefore, we postponed the following items due after the workshop:


Friday, February 8, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 7 fevereiro 2013



  • Video project: O que fazem os professores
    • We will have the first version of the video by February 17th.
  • Web:
    • By next meeting, we will finalize our personal descriptions of one paragraph and publish them on the blog.
  • Book reading (Greta Christina - Why are you atheists so angry):
    • We studied the Resources given by the author. Here is a list of our comments, relating the links to our intentions:
      • http://www.the-brights.net/  Has a lot of sources but not many activities. Has a very well organized database of books, blogs etc.
      • http://www.venganza.org/  A lot of pamphlets, stickers etc. Good activism material.
      • http://centerforinquiry.net/ Has lots of videos, articles that we could translate and use as an outreach opportunity.
      • http://www.ftsociety.org/ A more humanist group rather than an atheist one. Nice activism and networking, sometimes press releases etc. They host meet-ups in Lisbon too.
      • http://richarddawkinsfoundation.org/  Two words: Richard Dawkins.
      • http://secularstudents.org/ Purely American network of secularist student organizations. But they have a "group starting package" that might be useful.
      • http://www.atheismresource.com/ Lots of information such as videos, articles, short essays, book reviews etc. But doesn't have activism material.
      • http://godisimaginary.com/ Arguments that they have could be used in flyers or posters as they are short and clear.
      • http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Main_Page Good source for arguments and counter-arguments. But only that.
      • http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/ Greta says he is the Atheist Times where we can get recent atheist news.
    • We also noticed that she mentions a survey she has done in her blog about which ideas convinced former believers to become atheists. (Chapter 12) We decided to take a closer look at these reasons, pick our favorite ones, and discuss action possibilities in the next meeting.
  • We decided to attend the meet-up announced by Free Thought Society, the Encontros Ateistas e Humanistas de Lisboa, on February 20th, Wednesday, at 20h00.
  • There will be a workshop on communication with new media, in the following days. We will try to attend it.
  • Exchange Market (Mercado de Trocas)
    • Assembleia Popular de Graça e arredores is organizing an exchange market on February 16th, Saturday, between 11h00-16h00.
    • We decided to join the market and share books and videos in electronic format.
    • We will make a list of material we have and come up with a visual presentation to be used in our stand.
  • March 2nd, Que Se Lixe A Troika
    • We decided to join the demonstration and distribute flyers. Here are some ideas for the flyers. We will study each item and see if we can develop a flyer content from them:
      • Austerity (why austerity is not a solution)
      • Housing (the buildings that belong to the church or church related charity organizations, which are left abandoned while people need housing)
      • Religious institutions (How do religious schools and hospitals function? How do they get subsidized?)
      • Privileges of religious organizations (are priests subject to civil labor law? etc. Check: www.concordatwatch.eu )
  • Open discussion: We had an open discussion in the end of our meeting, related to
    • what we expect to achieve,
    • how to organize.
    • We aimed at not making any decisions but rather understanding each others' positions and expectations.


Saturday, February 2, 2013

Resumo da Reunião 31 janeiro 2013



  • Logo: We had the first version as a witch character and we agreed it to be the initial version. We had some concerns about the details. We will elaborate more and get several varieties to discuss in the future meetings.
  • Movie screening evaluation:
    • We had no logistical problems, and a good debate after the screening.
    • Overall, we all think we had a successful event. To improve ourselves, we decided to
      • strengthen our communication in the organization process,
      • visualize the event concretely in the preparations to avoid misunderstandings on expectations.
  • Web:
    • On Facebook, we will close the profile and function only through the group and the page.
    • We put a separate section where all our meeting minutes are available.
    • We are still working on our personal paragraphs for the upcoming section "Who are we?"
  • Book reading (Greta Christina - Why Are You Atheists So Angry):
    • We will share the links in the Facebook group and search through them to see what could be useful for us.
  • March 2nd, Que Se Lixe A Troika
    • We talked about how to participate in the demonstration and considered the option of distributing flyers.
    • We will come up with more concrete ideas for next week and discuss.
  • Video project: O que fazem os professores
    • We participated the Teachers' Demonstration (Manifestação Nacional dos Professores) on January 26th.
    • We translated Taylor Mali's poem What Teachers Make, and let people read it to the camera. We will soon have a video of it.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

A militant call for atheists

 

We are in a process of launching an activist group since more than a month. We attended the general strike on November 14th and distributed some 800 flyers. Since then, we have been holding our weekly meetings every Thursday at 19:30 in MobLisboa.

We are angry. We are enthusiastic. We are determined.

In the following months, we intend to

  • read books on atheism, discuss them, and get inspired by them to organize direct actions. We propose to start with Greta Christina's Why Are You Atheists So Angry. We will plan our reading in our next meeting.
  • make movie screenings on religion. We will see the possibilities and come to the next meeting prepared. If you think “Oh, I really wanted to watch this movie but I couldn't find time. Maybe we could watch it together and discuss it.” you are more than welcome to the meeting. :)
  • consider making some small performative direct actions in public spaces. If you have creative ideas of actions, don't hesitate to share them with us.
  • listen to what other atheists have to say, get inspired by each other and act up !

In short, if you are

an atheist, a skeptic, a free thinker
angry, and willing to take action,

show up in our next meeting on Thursday, November 13th, at 19:30 in MobLisboa.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

About Us


Introduction

Political Statement

Basic Principles


Don't hesitate to contact us by email: bruxas.nao.inflamaveis@gmail.com

Introduction




We are atheists. We are skeptics. We are free thinkers.

We condemn religion for politically and socially obstructing critical thinking.

We advocate a world where all the dogmas are questionable.


Why do you call yourselves The Non-Flammable Witches?

For centuries, the witches were the scapegoats for many social disasters. They were always the poorest classes of society. We believe this is not a coincidence.

The witch-burning rituals were not only a reproduction of patriarchy, but also created an atmosphere of social hysteria which blanketed the actual causes.

Yet today, we have stronger tools to understand and analyze the causes of our miseries, such as critical thinking and scientific discourse.

We are witches because we will point out the actual causes of our suffering. As with the witches in the past, we are not the cause but the victims of this destruction.

We are non-flammable witches because no witch-burning ritual put an end to the miseries of the world; the rituals actually created more witches.

In fact, it created more than that. Mohammed Bouazizi burning himself in Tunisia due to poverty and witches being burnt in the Early Modern period have a common root: They were made pay for the consequences they did not cause.


“Money is the god of this world; the bourgeois takes the proletarian’s money from him and so makes a practical atheist of him. ” [Friedrich Engels]


We are non-flammable witches because we get up, stand up, and don't give up the fight.

We invite everyone to question all the dogmas surrounding us. We invite everyone to fight against religions, the official historical maintainers of social dogmas.


What is religion?

Organized religion, from the very moment it emerged, has been a part of power relations. We believe that this is in the historical nature of religions.

We reject the hypocrisy of considering religions as mere personal beliefs. From sexual orientations to basic right claims and from formal education to gender politics, religion is a tool of oppression, misinformation and exploitation. Institutionalized religion is still one of the most important tools to legitimize sexism, injustice and inequalities.


We imagine a world where supernatural beliefs are purely personal issues. We imagine a world where free thought and critical thinking are the methods of social decisions.

We seek for freedom from religion.


What does “freedom from religion” mean?

In the social sense, we mean a society where every child is equidistant from all religions of the world and then considers each of them freely.

In the political sense, we mean a new social order where social institutions create an environment where all religions are equally available to the public.

Therefore, we demand the real freedom of individual religious beliefs.


How will freedom from religions be attained?

We highlight that there are 4200 active religions in the world (not counting the church of the flying spaghetti monster). Thus, freedom of religious belief requires either that we establish sanctuaries and recruit clergymen of each religion in all neighborhoods and villages or that we free the society from all religious institutions – political and social.







Political Stance

Basic Principles

Political Stance



We have a dream.

We imagine a world emancipated from all religions. We imagine a world where deceiving by means of dogmas is not possible anymore. We imagine a world where supernatural beliefs are purely personal issues. We imagine a world where free thought and critical thinking are the methods of making social decisions.

And we are not the only ones.


Religion: Against freedom.

We believe that religions are a political tool of oppression and a social tool of legitimizing inequities. Therefore, we will treat them as such.

We think that the religious institutions are one of the biggest obstacles to freedom. This obstacle does not affect only scientific education, children's rights, gender equality and democratic decision-making. We further argue that these religious institutions are against freedom of belief. Today, a Portuguese child is as free to choose her/his religion as a consumer is free to choose between products. They are not: As in the so-called free market, there are monopolies in religion.

By aiming at freedom from religion, we mean that we will fight against privileged religious beliefs: A society that has freedom of belief is a society that is equidistant to all the 4200 active religions around the world.


Atheism: For freedom.

“We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.” [Richard Dawkins]

And we, The Non-Flammable Witches, will go even further. We will not restrict our attention to supernatural dogmas, but extend our skeptical views towards more secular dogmas such as racism, nationalism, sexism and economic growth.

We have no tolerance for the deception and exploitation of the people. We will not be tolerant to institutionalized religions. Our tolerance is preserved for the 99%, who are working and producing, yet deprived and suffering.

Our atheism is a political stance; not a purely philosophical one. Our atheism is a scientific and social stance; not a merely personal one. Our atheism is part of the project of political and social emancipation.


What we have in the menu

Below is a list of some of our immediate demands. We intend to extend and deepen them during our activities.

Law: There should be no privileged positions in society or advantage in law for any individual or group by virtue of their religion or belief. Religious institutions should not be exempt from public investigations, inspection, and accountability criteria.

Education: Public education should be secular. State funding for religious and private schools should be abolished. Religious rituals and practices should be abandoned in education.
Public education should be based on evidence, and designed to promote critical thinking and scientific skepticism.

Taxing and Funding: Religious organizations and communities must not receive privileges and immunities, such as tax benefits or grants to promote religion.


Policy-making: Scientific skepticism and an evidence-based approach should be applied to all policy-making.


Principles


1. We feel responsible and obligated to stand out and reach out by organizing talks, issuing public declarations, running campaigns and making direct actions.


2. We make our decisions by the methods of participatory democracy.

3. We adopt a skeptical, scientific and critical approach.

4. We do not limit our critical approach with religion. We are against any kind of discrimination based on nationality, ethnicity, color, gender, sexual orientation and sexual identity.

5. We do not favor any ungrounded ideas. We are “narrow-minded” towards all the irrational belief systems ranging from pseudoscience to mysticism, from monotheistic religions to astrology.

6. While not hesitating to confront religious beliefs and institutions and criticizing religions, we do not approve of the humiliation of common people due to their religious beliefs. We fight ideas, not people. We take seriousness and sincerity as our political style.

7. We respect animal rights and all ecosystems as much as we respect human rights. We ground our lives and political stance not on the idea that the world was created for us, but on the knowledge that all beings in the world coexist as parts of the whole.

8. We take it as our principle to show solidarity to the individuals and groups compatible with our goals and principles stated in this text, and form co-operation with them within the bounds of possibility.





Basic Principles




1. We feel responsible and obligated to stand out and reach out by organizing talks, issuing public declarations, running campaigns and making direct actions.


2. We make our decisions by the methods of participatory democracy.

3. We adopt a skeptical, scientific and critical approach.

4. We do not limit our critical approach with religion. We are against any kind of discrimination based on nationality, ethnicity, color, gender, sexual orientation and sexual identity.

5. We do not favor any ungrounded ideas. We are “narrow-minded” towards all the irrational belief systems ranging from pseudoscience to mysticism, from monotheistic religions to astrology.

6. While not hesitating to confront religious beliefs and institutions and criticizing religions, we do not approve of the humiliation of common people due to their religious beliefs. We fight ideas, not people. We take seriousness and sincerity as our political style.

7. We respect animal rights and all ecosystems as much as we respect human rights. We ground our lives and political stance not on the idea that the world was created for us, but on the knowledge that all beings in the world coexist as parts of the whole.

8. We take it as our principle to show solidarity to the individuals and groups compatible with our goals and principles stated in this text, and form co-operation with them within the bounds of possibility.





Free Thought Movement network

The Non-Flammable Witches take part in the Özgür Düşünce Hareketi (Free Thought Movement) network. Therefore, our stance and our actions are compatible with the statement of the network, which can be reached below or in this link.


Who are we?

We are a group of activists who had been defending free thought on the Internet individually before we came together to advocate for atheism, agnosticism and freedom from religions, in an atmosphere in which rulers and their partners keep harping on the freedom of supernatural beliefs, the simplest criticism are considered as “humiliation of public values”, and the mere existence of atheists counts as an offense to religion.

We decided to build up an environment of solidarity against religious dogmas, with the aim of empowering, encouraging and reaching out to other free thinkers.


What is Religion?

All the assumptions that we call supernatural today are based on human efforts to explain phenomena that the past generations could not understand by or make sense of. By the emergence of the modern scientific reasoning, this practical reason-for-being of religions has disappeared.

Religion was humanity’s first attempt to systematically investigate the causality relations in natural and social phenomena. As an attempt, it was the predecessor of modern science; being the first attempt, it was inadequate and inconsistent. Religion tried to respond to many socio-psychological problems and questions that were either already present or developed after the emergence of religion. In this context, we are aware that, while its practical reason-for-being is gone, there are still plenty of reasons for religion itself to survive.

Organized religion, from the very moment it emerged, has become a part of power relations. Today, religious institutions are still one of the most important tools to legitimize injustice, inequalities and all the miseries in the world.

Our common denominator is that religions are not just personal opinions. Instantiating from sexual orientations to basic rights claims and from formal education to gender politics, religion is a tool of sovereignty and therefore should be discussed on a social rather than an individual level.

The Historical Journey of Religion and Atheist/Agnostic Ideas

The history of atheism is as old as the history of scientific thought. For instance, and these instances are present all around the world, Ancient Greek thinkers of the 8th century B.C.E. chose, instead of attributing supernatural forces to natural phenomena, to develop a critical thinking and to explain the world with worldly tools. This conception has become the basis of the modern natural sciences we utilize today.

The history of the struggle for a better world is as old as the history of inequities. Until the end of the Middle Ages, those who fought against the power of religion again referred back to religion. The real means for the emancipation of humanity from religions emerged only with the Enlightenment. Thanks to modern science, religion has become obsolete for humans to interpret the world and their existence in it. The secularization of the world led to the criticisms of many other inequities that were practiced via religion. Thus started a process whereby monarchies collapsed, politics became public practice, gender equality was recognized (at least legally), laicism was adopted as a political principle, and public scientific education became widespread.

At some point, the appropriators of power realized where this was leading to. In addition to monotheistic religions being supported, many new-age religions (such as Scientology, Mormonism, Quantum Thinking) were released to the market. What is unquestionable and indisputable dramatically multiplied. With items like private property, “religious and moral values of the public”, state security and economic development, it has become either impossible or forbidden to reason beyond the irrational logic that the system imposes.

Recent political maneuvers, which bring gender equality into question, introduce the creationism nonsense into biology textbooks as an alternative opinion, and describe atheism as a perversion in religion courses, are just parts of this process. Today religion has become the institutionalized tool of exploitation that persuades the masses to the material inequities and the destruction of the global capital. This tool is presented as a painkiller to the 99% of society who lead a miserable and anxious daily life and thereby prevents the power of the privileged minority who lives off their misery from being questioned.

We are raising the bet.


What are our goals?

We came together, on a scientific and social basis, in order to fight against the institutionalization of religion. We believe that religion not only narrows down people’s ideas in the intellectual sense but also functions as a tool for oppression and exploitation. We imagine a world where free thinking and humane life are possible.

As mentioned previously, we are aware that religion is either the same thing as or else allied with the rulers. Therefore, we know that, along our path towards our goals, we will have to confront all the owners and protectors of the existing order.

What do we have in our agenda?

1. We aim at creating ways for atheists to come out. We object to free thought being caged into the realm of the internet and then also getting more and more suppressed there.

We think that each atheist to come out will have a significant contribution to this process. The social hysteria atmosphere that we are exposed to are produced by systematic hate speech, and its cracks lie in real human relationships.

2. We take a stand against the censorship on science and the current rush to falsify scientific facts. We assume a role in informing the public about the facts. Furthermore, we support all the activities in this direction.

3. We object to the rules and practices of a certain religion being introduced to the education system (either as compulsory or “compulsory-elective” courses) without the inclusion of any scientific critical thinking.

4. We see laicism as our political necessary condition not to be relinquished.

5. We are against the religionization of the social life and the indirect imposition of a religious lifestyle both by force or by regulations that would require such lifestyles.

Our principles

1. We feel responsible and obligated to create social opportunities to come out and speak out.

2. We adopt a sceptical, scientific and critical approach.

3. We do not limit our critical approach with religion. We are against any kind of discrimination based on nationality, ethnicity, color, gender, sexual orientation and sexual identity.

4. We do not favor any of the ungrounded ideas. We are “narrow-minded” towards all the irrational nonsense ranging from pseudoscience to mysticism, from monotheistic religions to astrology.

5. While not hesitating to confront religious beliefs and institutions and criticizing religions, we do not approve of the humiliation of common people due to their religious beliefs. We take seriousness and sincerity as our political style.

6. We respect animal rights and all ecosystems as much as we respect human rights. We ground our lives and political stance not on the idea that the world was created for us, but on the knowledge that all beings in the world coexist as parts of the whole.

7. We take it as our principle to show solidarity to the individuals and groups compatible with our goals and principles stated in this text, and form co-operation with them within the bounds of possibility.


Free Thought Movement – Özgür Düşünce Hareketi